Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903

Balderman v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Balderman v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 6, 1903 · Blanchard
84 N.Y.S. 1118 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

H. A. Robinson (Arthur K. Wing and F. Angelo Gaynor, of counsel), for appellant. Droege & Schavrin, for respondent.

Balderman v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Opinion of the Court

BLANCHARD, J.

We do not think the verdict is grossly against the weight of evidence, nor even that it preponderates in favor of the defendant. The case was fairly submitted to the jury by the learned trial court, and the jury resolved the conflict in the evidence in favor of the plaintiff. As there is evidence to sustain the verdict, we do not think it should be disturbed. The judgment and order must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.