Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903

Lovinsky v. Rosenberg

Lovinsky v. Rosenberg
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 22, 1903 · MacLean
84 N.Y.S. 1134 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

John E. Donnelly, for appellant., Alex B. Greenberg, for respondent.

Lovinsky v. Rosenberg

Opinion of the Court

MacLEAN, J.

Upon a claim by an assignee for goods sold and delivered, and sale and delivery admitted, the defendant urged payment. That fact was disputed, and found against him, and no sufficient reason appears for interference here, excepting that, as the claim, dating from December 8, 1897, was for $106.25 and interest, and payment of $19 thereon was admitted by the assignor of the plaintiff, to whom, as testified, had been assigned the balance, the judgment rendered for $137.25 must be reduced to the sum of $115, besides costs, and, as thus modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal. Judgment reduced to $115, besides costs, and, as thus modified, affirmed, without ■costs of this appeal. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.