Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903

Robbins v. Bridgman

Robbins v. Bridgman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 18, 1903 · Blanchard
84 N.Y.S. 1143 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Charles H. Luscomb, for appellant., Maas & Goldberg, for respondent.

Robbins v. Bridgman

Opinion of the Court

BLANCHARD, J.

The only question which appears to have been seriously litigated in this action was whether or not the plaintiff’s assignor was able, to secure a theatrical license, as contemplated by the agreement of August, 1902. ¿This was a question of fact, which the trial justice resolved in favor of the plaintiff, and we think his determination is fully justified by the evidence in the case. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.