Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903

Worthington v. Dutch Decorative Art Co.

Worthington v. Dutch Decorative Art Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 18, 1903
84 N.Y.S. 1151 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Stern, Singer & Barr, for appellant., W. H. Dodd, for respondent.

Worthington v. Dutch Decorative Art Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The evidence established the plaintiff’s acquiescence in the reduction of his salary subsequent to January 10, 1903, and the judgment should be reduced by $60, representing 12 weeks’ work at $5 per week; that sum being the difference between the original rate of $25 and the reduced rate of $20. The judgment should be modified by reducing it to $130.87, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal. Judgment modified by reducing amount of recovery to the sum of $130.87, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.