Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904

Ewell v. Kennedy

Ewell v. Kennedy
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 7, 1904
85 N.Y.S. 1129 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Frank C. Mebane (Isaac N. Miller, of counsel), for appellant. Atwater & Cruikshank, for respondents.

Ewell v. Kennedy

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We do not think that any question of title to real property arises under the pleadings in this action to entitle the plaintiff to a full bill of costs, as claimed by him, *1130under section 3228 of the Code of Civil Procedure. So far, however, as the order directs the entry of judgment in favor of the defendants for the amount of the costs as taxed, it is unauthorized ; and the order appealed from should be modified by striking out the provision to that effect, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs to either party.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.