Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904

Department of Health v. City Real Property Investing Co.

Department of Health v. City Real Property Investing Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 7, 1904
86 N.Y.S. 18 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

George L. Rives (Frederick W. Steele, of counsel), for appellant., Carter & Ledyard (John Vimont Lyle, of counsel), for respondent.

Department of Health v. City Real Property Investing Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

There was no evidence of any kind adduced upon the trial showing the provision of the Sanitary Code or of the health laws, the violation of which was alleged as the basis of the recovery of a penalty. The courts cannot take judicial notice of the existing provisions of the health department. Section 94.1 of the Code of Civil Procedure prescribes the mode of proof in such cases.

The judgment was properly set aside upon motion, and the order is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to respondent to abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.