Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904

Klein v. Dunn

Klein v. Dunn
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 25, 1904
86 N.Y.S. 101 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Joel M. Marx, for appellant., Philip J. Britt, for respondent.

Klein v. Dunn

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon the facts disclosed by the record the action of the trial justice in granting to the defendant a new trial, under' section 999 of the Code, after a verdict in favor of the plaintiff upon a contested trial, cannot be disturbed. The authorities are strongly in favor of the exercise of the power in a proper case. Ferguson v. Gill, 74 Hun, 566, 26 N. Y. Supp. 596; Young v. Stone, 77 Hun, 395, 28 N. Y. Supp. 881; Ludeman v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 30 App. Div. 522, 52 N. Y. Supp. 310; Silverman v. Dry Dock, E. B. & B. R. R. Co., 69 App. Div. 22, 74 N. Y. Supp. 481.

Order affirmed,- with costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.