Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904

Manning v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

Manning v. Interurban Street Railway Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 19, 1904
88 N.Y.S. 386 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Henry W. Goddard and William E. Weaver, for appellant., E. Van Dernoot, for respondent.

Manning v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion that, in the absence of proof reasonable value, the money paid by plaintiff for horse hire and wagon hire formed no portion of the damages for which plaintiff could recover in this action. Certainly he would not have had the right to hire a wagon and a horse for a year, and charge the defendant with the sum he had paid for wagon hire and horse hire. Moreover, it was error to permit the witness Schumacher to testify as to the value of the horse before the accident, because there is no evidence that he had ever seen the horse before the accident.

Judgment is reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless plaintiff consents to a reduction of the judgment to $70, in which case judgment is affirmed, without costs in this court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.