Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904

Kirschner v. Hirschberg

Kirschner v. Hirschberg
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 10, 1904
90 N.Y.S. 351 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

N. Ballin, for appellants., C. S. Rosenthal, for respondent.

Kirschner v. Hirschberg

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The ruling of the trial court sustaining objec_ tion to question addressed to witness Peltz was correct. It was not claimed that this witness ever had personal knowledge of the *352work done by plaintiff. Consequently she could not have had any memory on the subject which it was possible to refresh. The entire record is free from prejudicial error.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.