Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904

Hallwood Cash Register Co. v. Greenberger

Hallwood Cash Register Co. v. Greenberger
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 10, 1904
90 N.Y.S. 361 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Spiro & Wasservogel, for appellant., Emanuel Klein, for respondent.

Hallwood Cash Register Co. v. Greenberger

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The defendant in person signed the contract, and the signature does not appear to be that of an inexperienced penman. The register in question was in his place of business *362at' the time. If he did not know what he was signing, that is his fault. He could write, and there is no pretense that he could not read.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant tp abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.