Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904

Lederer v. Krausz

Lederer v. Krausz
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 10, 1904
90 N.Y.S. 402 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

J. M. Allen, for appellants., M. Marks, for respondent.

Lederer v. Krausz

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

No affidavits or other papers were submitted in the court below by plaintiff upon this motion. In the absence of proof authorizing the court, in the exercise of a sound discretion, to deny defendants’ motion, the defendants, according to uniform practice, were entitled, upon the verified allegations contained in *403their moving papers, to the stay asked for. Barton v. Speis, 73 N. Y. 133; Richardson v. White, 27 How. Prac. 153.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.

[ 1. See Costs, vol. 13, Cent. Dig. §§ 1045-1049.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.