Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904

Hamburger v. Hellman

Hamburger v. Hellman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 7, 1904
90 N.Y.S. 1060 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Messmore Kendall, for appellant., Max Schleimer, for respondents.

Hamburger v. Hellman

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The summons in this action demands a judgment for $500 and interest. The pleadings are oral. Plaintiff’s bill of particulars sets forth claims aggregating $507.33. Under the decision of this court in Pierson v. Hughes, 88 N. Y. Supp. 1059, the Municipal Court has no jurisdiction in the action, and the judgment herein must be reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs, but, in order to settle this question, with leave to the respondent to appeal to the Appellate Division.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.