Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904

Bernstein v. Bear Lithia Springs Water Co.

Bernstein v. Bear Lithia Springs Water Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 7, 1904 · Gildersleeve
90 N.Y.S. 1061 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Charles S. Rosenthal, for appellant., Frederick L. C. Keating, for respondent.

Bernstein v. Bear Lithia Springs Water Co.

Opinion of the Court

GILDERSLEEVE, J.

There was sufficient testimony presented on the part of the plaintiff herein to warrant its submission and a decision of the case upon the merits. This view was concededly taken by the trial court at the close of the trial, as he denied defendant’s motion for a dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint, but subsequently rendered a judgment dismissing the complaint. Therein he was in error. It does not appear that the dismissal was upon the merits, and we are forced to the conclusion that it was for insufficiency of proof. A nonsuit. Place v. Hayward, 117 N. Y. 487, 23 N. E. 25; Schlesinger v. Jud, 61 App. Div. 453, 70 N. Y. Supp. 616.

Judgment reversed. New trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.