Lambert v. Mutual Reserve Life Ins.
Lambert v. Mutual Reserve Life Ins.
90 N.Y.S. 1103
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
The facts essential to support the jurisdiction of the court of North Carolina, by virtue of service upon the insurance commissioner, are recited in the records of these cases with greater particularity than in the action of Johnston v. This Defendant (opinion filed herewith) 90 N. Y. Supp. 539, and the records are complete, without report to extraneous proof. Judgments affirmed, with costs.
BISCHOFF, J., takes no part. FITZGERALD, J., concurs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.