Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904

Woodward v. Schaefer

Woodward v. Schaefer
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 7, 1904
91 N.Y.S. 104 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

A. J. Westermayr, for appellant., Ford & Tuttle, for respondent.

Woodward v. Schaefer

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon the affidavit of the opposing creditor and the nonproduction of the debtor’s schedules in the bankruptcy proceedings the denial of the motion for the discharge of the judgtment may well be sustained under the decisions of Columbia Bank v. Birkett, 174 N. Y. 112, 66 N. E. 652; Tyrrel v. Hammerstein, 33 Misc. Rep. 506, 67 N. Y. Supp. 717; Sutherland v. Lasher, 41 Misc. Rep. 249, 84 N. Y. Supp. 56, affirmed 87 App. Div. 633, 84 N. Y. Supp. 1148; Bernheim v. Bloch (decided by the present term of this court) 91 N. Y. Supp. 40.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.