American Trading Co. v. Bedouin Steam Navigation Co.
Opinion of the Court
In order to obtain a warrant of attachment, it was necessary for plaintiff to show, not merely to allege, that defendant is a foreign corporation. Such fact may be said to be shown, if it is positively alleged by some person who may be deemed to have personal knowledge upon the subject, so that his statement can be accepted as evidme- f the fact. Ladenburg v. Commercial Bank, 5 App. Div. 219. It cannot be said to be so shown when the person making the allegation, although he may do so positively, as of his own knowledge, is evidently and obviously not in a position to possess personal knowledge upon the subject. James v. Signell, 60 App. Div. 75. The affiant swears that he is in the employ of plaintiff and is manager for its hemp department. This fact may lend some color to his averment that he has personal knowledge of the purchase of hemp in the Philippine Islands and its shipment from Manila, although that does not appear wholly probable; but it certainly lends no color, to the statement that he has personal knowledge of the fact and place of incorporation of the owner of the steamship by which the hemp was conveyed from Manila to New York. It may he that he is quite right in saying that defendant owns the steamship and it may even be that his belief on that
The order appealed from must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to vacate the attachment granted, with ten dollars costs.
Gildersxeeve and MaoLeah, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.