Cinberg v. Interurban Street Railway Co.
Cinberg v. Interurban Street Railway Co.
92 N.Y.S. 1
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
The defendant admitted on the record that it operated and controlled both lines of cars. The defendant made no motion for judgment on any ground, and did not suggest any failure of proof as to the contract between the two companies. If it had objected on that score, we may assume that the defect would have been supplied. The objection cannot be taken for the first time on appeal.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.