Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905

Siegel v. Solomon

Siegel v. Solomon
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 23, 1905
92 N.Y.S. 238 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Alfred B. Jaworower, for appellant., Julius G. Kremer, for respondents.

Siegel v. Solomon

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is premature. The order is not final, but merely interlocutory and conditional. It does not adjudge the appellant guilty of contempt, and for lack of proper adjudication it is obvious that no commitment can issue upon it. Before the appellant can be committed, another order must be made, and from that an appeal will lie. Non constat that on an application for such an order something may appear to the court which will cause it to withhold the order. Brinkley v. Brinkley, 47 N. Y. 40; Greite v. Hendricks (Sup.) 24 N. Y. Supp. 546.

The appeal must be dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.