Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905

Fidelity Loan Ass'n v. Connolly

Fidelity Loan Ass'n v. Connolly
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 23, 1905 · Scott
92 N.Y.S. 252 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Jacob Stiefel, for appellant., Aaron Morris, for respondent.

Fidelity Loan Ass'n v. Connolly

Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, J.

It is well settled in this state that after default the mortgagor in a chattel mortgage has no further interest in, or title to or right of possession of, the mortgaged property. Leadbetter v. Leadbetter, 125 N. Y. 290, 294, 26 N. E. 265, 21 Am. St. Rep. 738. He becomes merely the bailee of the mortgagee, and replevin is the appropriate remedy. Section 139 of the municipal court act (Laws 1902, p. 1533, c. 580) forbids such an action only in case of a contract of conditional sale of personal property, a hiring of personal property when title is not to ' vest in the person hiring until the payment of a certain sum, or a chattel mortgage made to secure the purchase price of chattels. The present action does not arise upon any of the contracts specified in this section. It is the ordinary case of a chattel mortgage to secure a loan.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.