Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905

Levy v. Hatch

Levy v. Hatch
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 23, 1905
92 N.Y.S. 287 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Weill & Weill, for appellant., Frederick N. Van Zandt, for respondent.

Levy v. Hatch

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The order granting a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence must be reversed. The affidavit of defendant is clearly insufficient. All he says is that after the trial he found a check which he had paid to plaintiff and had not produced or proved on the trial. He does not show that he made any search before the trial, or give any reason why he did not find it. He does not even say that it was paid on account of the debt for which he was sued.

Order reversed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.