Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905

Fitzgerald v. New York City Railway Co.

Fitzgerald v. New York City Railway Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 21, 1905
92 N.Y.S. 732 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

James H. Hickey, for appellant., William E. Weaver, for respondent.

Fitzgerald v. New York City Railway Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

It cannot be said to be contributory negligence, as a matter of law, for a person to cross a street railway track between two motionless cars. The circumstances under which this accident happened made it incumbent upon defendant to explain, how it happened that the car started and struck the plaintiff. The-dismissal of the complaint was error.

Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.