Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905

Pergoli v. Lyman

Pergoli v. Lyman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 21, 1905 · Scott
92 N.Y.S. 788 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Sheridan S. Norton, for appellant., Morris J. Hirsch, for respondent.

Pergoli v. Lyman

Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, J.

The order appointing a referee to take the deposition of the appellant should have been vacated, if for no other reason because notice of the application therefor was not given to the plaintiff’s attorney. Furthermore, the affidavit upon which the order was granted was insufficient, in that it failed to state any facts upon which the court could find that the examination was necessary. It contains merely the attorney’s conclusions.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.