Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905

Young v. New York City Railway Co.

Young v. New York City Railway Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 29, 1905
93 N.Y.S. 1151 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

William E. Weaver, for appellant., Carruth, Ziegler & Carruth, for respondent.

Young v. New York City Railway Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion that none of the exceptions were well taken. The objection on page 5 of the stenographer’s minutes appears to have been made after the question had been asked and answered; and, moreover, under the circumstances disclosed by the evidence in the case, the plaintiff was entitled to recover, as one of the elements of the damages sustained by him, the amount paid by him fot a wagon to take the place of the wagon destroyed by the defendant. The evidence warrants the finding of the justice. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.