Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905

Schlesinger v. Rachmil

Schlesinger v. Rachmil
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 23, 1905 · Riam
94 N.Y.S. 12 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Kneeland, La Petra & Glaze (Charles E.- Thorn, of counsel), for appellant., Goldfogle, Cohn & Lind, for respondent.

Schlesinger v. Rachmil

Opinion of the Court

PER CU1RIAM.

Under subdivision 3, § 152, Municipal Court Act (Laws 1902, p. 1539, c. 580), all that defendant was entitled to. was to set off against plaintiff’s claim so much of the amount claimed by defendant as would satisfy plaintiff’s demand. The section, forbids an affirmative judgment upon the counterclaim.

The judgment must be modified so as to dismiss the complaint upon the merits, and, as so modified, will be affirmed, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.