Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905

Josephson v. Woods

Josephson v. Woods
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 23, 1905
94 N.Y.S. 30 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Nathan Vidaver, for appellant., -Henry J. Goldsmith, for respondent.

Josephson v. Woods

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

There is absolutely no reason why this appeal should have been taken. The questions in the case were questions of fact. Those questions of fact have been_ determined in favor of the defendant by the court, after it had an opportunity of hearing and seeing the witnesses. We will not interfere with the decision of the trial court.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.