Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905

Margolys v. Mollenick

Margolys v. Mollenick
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 22, 1905
94 N.Y.S. 301 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

C. Soble, for appellants., C. Klein, for respondent.

Margolys v. Mollenick

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Unusual, or, rather, extraordinary in the sense of being contrary to the Code and rules regulating procedure, as is granting a motion to open a default already denied by one justice and brought without leave before another upon similar and insufficient papers at best, this court may not entertain this appeal, be*302cause, under the present statute, no appeal may lie in the first instance from an order opening a default and vacating a judgment entered therein. Section 257, p. 1563, c. 580, Laws 1902.

Appeal dismissed, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.