Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905

Deane v. Sire

Deane v. Sire
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 22, 1905
94 N.Y.S. 1143 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

William L. Stone, Jr., for appellant., Maxwell C. Katz, for respondent.

Deane v. Sire

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

It does not appear that the verdict was against the weight of evidence. The arbitration clause did not constitute a condition precedent (Seward v. City of Rochester, 109 N. Y. 164, 16 N. E. 348), and there is no exception to a ruling that may have prejudiced the defendant. Hence the judgment and order will be affirmed. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.