Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905

Livingston v. Weiss

Livingston v. Weiss
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 22, 1905
94 N.Y.S. 1152 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

A. S. Rosenthal, for appellant., Wentworth, Lowenstein & Stern, for respondent.

Livingston v. Weiss

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Assuming that the action is maintainable, the judgment is unwarranted. The respondent presents a computation sugr gestive of the way in which the justice reasoned in reaching the conclusion that $17.50 damages to defendant "had been shown. An item of $105 as chargeable to plaintiff by defendant appears in the computation, but there was no evidence that the plaintiff had received $105 for which he should account to defendant. There must be a reversal, and a new trial, with costs to appellant to .abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.