Schenkel v. Lischinsky
Schenkel v. Lischinsky
94 N.Y.S. 1162
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
The pleadings were oral. The plaintiff complaining alleged conversion. The defendant, answering, denied generally. The issue thus made was tried, and judgment rendered for the defendant. As there was no evidence of conversion, the judgment will be affirmed, with costs. The issue was not as in Weinberg v. Greenberger (Sup.) 93 N. Y. Supp. 530; hence the result is unlike. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.