Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905

Schenkel v. Lischinsky

Schenkel v. Lischinsky
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 22, 1905
94 N.Y.S. 1162 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Schleimer & Schleimer, for appellant., Samuel Hellinger, for respondent.

Schenkel v. Lischinsky

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The pleadings were oral. The plaintiff complaining alleged conversion. The defendant, answering, denied generally. The issue thus made was tried, and judgment rendered for the defendant. As there was no evidence of conversion, the judgment will be affirmed, with costs. The issue was not as in Weinberg v. Greenberger (Sup.) 93 N. Y. Supp. 530; hence the result is unlike. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.