Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905

Tansley v. Higgins

Tansley v. Higgins
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 26, 1905
94 N.Y.S. 1164 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

A. T. Stoutenburfan, for appellants., Isidore Hershfield, for respondent.

Tansley v. Higgins

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The case for the plaintiff is no stronger than that which was considered upon the former appeal. 88 N. Y. Supp. 1005. As the judgment then was clearly against the evidence, so is the verdict and judgment now. The same considerations which called .for the reversal of the former judgment equally call for a reversal of this judgment. Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.