Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905

Fromme v. Poerschke

Fromme v. Poerschke
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 27, 1905
95 N.Y.S. 525 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

William R. Hill, for appellant., Fromme Bros., for respondent.

Fromme v. Poerschke

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from involves no part of the merits and affects no substantial right. It is simply declaratory of the fact, which is not disputed, that the defendant by his neglect to serve a case on appeal had waived or abandoned his right to do so; for there is no significant difference between the wprd “abandoned,” used in the order, and the word “waived,” used in rule 33. The order has not in any wise affected the right of either party, and the worst that can be said of it is that it was unnecessary.

As it does not affect any right, it is not appealable, and the appeal must be dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.