Needham v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
Needham v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
95 N.Y.S. 561
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
There was no proof of negligence. All that is testified to is by the plaintiff that as he walked towards the door the train came to a “sudden stop” and he was thrown down. This is not sufficient to justify the inference that defendant or any of its servants were negligent. The complaint should have been dismissed. Black v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 2 App. Div. 387, 37 N. Y. Supp. 830.
Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.