Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905

David Stevenson Brewing Co. v. Graziadio

David Stevenson Brewing Co. v. Graziadio
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 24, 1905
95 N.Y.S. 1124 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Henry M. Heymann, for appellants., Thomas J. Farrell, for respondent.

David Stevenson Brewing Co. v. Graziadio

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Gross abuse of discretion by the court in opening the default of the plaintiff not appearing, and after the entry of judgment the plaintiff “being at liberty to employ any other attorney to take such action in relation to the judgment and cause as he desired, without any order of substitution” (Davis v. Solomon, 25 Misc. Rep. 695, 696, 56 N. Y. Supp, *112580), the order appealed from must be affirmed. Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.