Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905

Kirschner v. Mahoney

Kirschner v. Mahoney
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 24, 1905 · MacLean
96 N.Y.S. 195 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Claude Cignoux, for appellant., Daniel S. Decker, for respondent.

Kirschner v. Mahoney

Opinion of the Court

MacLEAN, J.

The plaintiff failing to prove, as was necessary, an indebtedness by the owner to the contractor (Keavey v. DeRago, 20 Misc. Rep. 105, 45 N. Y. Supp. 77), in his action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, was not entitled to judgment therefor (Madden v. Lennon, 23 Misc. Rep. 704, 52 N. Y. Supp. 8), and, the evidence being vague as to who is his debtor for goods sold and delivered, a personal judgment may not by modification be rendered, under the provisions of section 3412 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The judgment must therefore be reversed, and a new trial ordered.

Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.