Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905

Stone v. Plaut

Stone v. Plaut
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 21, 1905 · Bischoff
96 N.Y.S. 1030 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Henry Brill, for appellant., Frederick W. Hinrichs, for respondents.

Stone v. Plaut

Opinion of the Court

BISCHOFF, J.

In our opinion the plaintiff was properly nonsuited, and the judgment should be affirmed. Engaged to procure-a loan of not less than $225,000 or $220,000, the plaintiff’s efforts failed to secure anything better than a tentative offer of $210,000; and, this not being-accepted, he admittedly abandoned his interest in the matter, as appears from his own letter. Thereafter the defendants took the loan at $200,-000 from the party with whom the plaintiff had negotiated, but this gave him no cause of action for commissions. He had been employed to obtain a loan at or above a minimum limit, which he failed to do, and the defendants, acting upon his written disclaimer of further employment, proceeded to obtain a substantially smaller loan themselves. Here is no reasonable suggestion of bad faith, and a verdict for the plaintiff would have been quite without support in the evidence. That upon the facts presented the broker has no claim to commissions is a proposition well settled by authority. Donovan v. Weed, 182 N. Y. 43, 74 N. E. 563 ; Sibbald v. Bethlehem Iron Works, 83 N. Y. 378, 38 Am. Rep 441.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.