Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906

Redmond v. Hatch

Redmond v. Hatch
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 15, 1906
50 Misc. 643

Counsel

Thomas 0. McDonald, for appellant,, Bollins & Bollins, for respondents.

Redmond v. Hatch

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The testimony shows that the plaintiff, who was a police officer, while standing at a street crossing, regulating traffic' on the streets, and in such a position that he could not see the defendants’ driver, was knocked down and run over in broad daylight; that the driver of the defendants’ horses had ample room to pass plaintiff without striking him, and that there was nothing to obscure the vision of the driver. The driver was not called on the trial.

We are of the opinion that the plaintiff showed that he was free from contributory negligence, and that the injuries that he received were caused through the negligence of the defendants’ driver.

Judgment appealed from is reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present: Scott, Tbuax and Bischoee, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.