Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906

Miller v. New York City Railway Co.

Miller v. New York City Railway Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided July 1, 1906 · Cubiam
51 Misc. 650; 99 N.Y.S. 867

Counsel

William E. Weaver, for appellant., Gustaras A. Rogers, for respondent.

Miller v. New York City Railway Co.

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

This judgment should be reversed. The negligence alleged against the defendant is' that the car was so carelessly and negligently managed by the defendant that it was derailed. The testimony shows that the car was moving slowly, when it struck an unseen obstruction which caused it suddenly to jerk and stop. Upon examination it was found that a piece of á horse shoe had dropped into the slot, where the plow of the cars runs, and was tightly wedged *651therein. The car immediately ahead of the one to which the accident happened had proceeded safely over the rails, thus showing that the accident was clearly unavoidable and not caused by any negligence of the defendant. '

Present: Gildeesleeve, Levehtbitt and McCall, JJ.

. Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.