Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906

Hart v. Kaplan

Hart v. Kaplan
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 15, 1906
52 Misc. 653; 101 N.Y.S. 763

Counsel

Isadore M. Levy, for appellant., Sachs & Levy, for respondents.

Hart v. Kaplan

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiara.

Appeal from order granting motion for re-argument dismissed, with ten dollars, costs, the order not being appealable.

The order granting a new trial appealed from was largely discretionary and we do not feel that it should be reversed. Costs should have been imposed, however, as a condition for its being granted.

Order affirmed, upon condition that the plaintiffs, within five days after the entry and service of a copy of this order, pay to the defendant ten dollars costs of the motion (Mnnic. Ot. Act, § 254) and costs of this appeal. 'Otherwise order reversed, with costs and verdict reinstated.

Present: Gildebsleeve, Fitzgebald and Davis, JJ.

Appeal from order granting motion for reargument dismissed.

Order granting new trial affirmed upon condition that plaintiffs, within five days after entry and service of a copy of this order, pay to defendant ten dollars costs of motion and costs of this appeal. Otherwise order reversed, with costs, and verdict reinstated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.