Kahn v. Eisenberg
Kahn v. Eisenberg
97 N.Y.S. 959
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
The instrument sued upon guarantied, in the event the notes in question were not paid when due, that the defendants would “jointly and severally pay the said notes and any expenses involved in the collection of this claim.” This was clearly a guaranty of payment, and not of collection. There was ample evidence to sustain the conclusion reached by the trial justice, and we find no reversible errors in the rulings made.
Judgments affirmed, with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.