Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906

Dutch v. Parker

Dutch v. Parker
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 2, 1906 · Greenbaum
97 N.Y.S. 966 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Henry S. Goodspeed, for appellant., Marcus Helfand, for respondent.

Dutch v. Parker

Opinion of the Court

GREENBAUM, J.

Both parties concede that plaintiff is indebted to defendant in the sum of $120.47 as a result of certain debit and credit transactions between them. The accounts produced by defendant show that the said balance of $120.47 is made up by giving credit to plaintiff for the articles replevied. It is obvious if this account be correct that the title to the articles is in defendant. But the plaintiff produces no proof whatever as to how the balance, which he admits he owes defendant, is made up. Under such circumstances, it is clear that not only is a finding of title in the plaintiff against the weight of evidence, but almost conclusive proof is established that defendant, and not the plaintiff, is the owner of the chattels replevied.

The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs and disbursements to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.