Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906

Dickerson v. Wayne Kratzer & Co.

Dickerson v. Wayne Kratzer & Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 27, 1906 · Giegerich, Greenbaum, Scott
97 N.Y.S. 1132 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Henry S. J. Flynn, for appellants., Eugene N. Robinson, for respondent.

Dickerson v. Wayne Kratzer & Co.

Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, P. J.

There is absolutely no proof of damage in the case. By the judgment appealed from the plaintiff would still own the automobile, for there is neither allegation nor proof of a sale to defendant, and would recover its full value from defendant. The judgment should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Concurring Opinion

GREENBAUM, J.,

concurs.

Dissenting Opinion

GIEGERICH, J.

(dissenting). By guarantying that a certain price should be forthcoming to the plaintiff at a certain date, the defendant in effect agreed to become the purchaser of the machine at that price, if he found no one else to take it. By suing for and recovering judgment for the agreed price, the plaintiff has treated the transaction as a sale and the machine now belongs to the defendant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.