Freedman v. Kramer
Freedman v. Kramer
97 N.Y.S. 1134
(New York Supplement)
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff owed defend ant $30 for the June rent, and the fact of thi fire did not cancel this indebtedness. The evi dence that the premises were rendered “uninhab ¡table and wholly unfair for occupancy” wa; slight, but we do not feel called upon to overruh the decision of the trial justice on this point The judgment must be modified, by deducting the $30 owed by plaintiff to defendant, and, a¡ modified, affirmed, without costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.