Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906

Freedman v. Kramer

Freedman v. Kramer
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 27, 1906
97 N.Y.S. 1134 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Jacob Rieger, foi appellant., Charles Tolleris, for respondent.

Freedman v. Kramer

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff owed defend ant $30 for the June rent, and the fact of thi fire did not cancel this indebtedness. The evi dence that the premises were rendered “uninhab ¡table and wholly unfair for occupancy” wa; slight, but we do not feel called upon to overruh the decision of the trial justice on this point The judgment must be modified, by deducting the $30 owed by plaintiff to defendant, and, a¡ modified, affirmed, without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.