Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906

Sicurezza v. Crisanti

Sicurezza v. Crisanti
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 26, 1906 · Gorman
97 N.Y.S. 1147 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Charles E. Le Barbier, for appellant., Edward J. Kelly, for respondent.

Sicurezza v. Crisanti

Opinion of the Court

O’GORMAN, J.

The action is for slander, and on defendant’s alleged default the damages-were assessed at $2,000. After the entry of judgment and issuance of execution, the defendant moved to set aside the judgment 'on the-ground that the summons was never served upon him. The learned justice at Special Term denied this application, but from an examination of the papers we entertain such a serious-doubt as to whether the summons was served that in our opinion the ends of justice will be best served by granting the motion, and thus-give the defendant an opportunity to have his-day in court. Order reversed, and motion granted, with $10 costs to the defendant. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.