Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906

Knecht v. New York City Ry. Co.

Knecht v. New York City Ry. Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 24, 1906
98 N.Y.S. 1106 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

William E. Weaver, for appellant. Edward D. Loughman, for respondent.

Knecht v. New York City Ry. Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The defendant concedes its liability, but questions the amount awarded as damages. Plaintiff’s injuries were very slight, and the damages seem to be unreasonably large. There is reason to believe that the jury may have been influenced by the persistent efforts to bring to their attention the unfortunate results suffered by other persons by reason of the same accident. The judgment must be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce the judgment to $200.50, in which case the judgment, as modified, will be affirmed, without costs to either party.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.