Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906

Duffy v. Dusenbury

Duffy v. Dusenbury
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 20, 1906
99 N.Y.S. 1138 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Clark A. Wick and Clark L. Jordan, for appellant., Henry J. Hemmens and Charles S. Taylor, for respondent.

Duffy v. Dusenbury

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The sole question upon which we are asked to reverse the judgment is that it is based upon a verdict which is against the weight of evidence. While .the trial disclosed facts which militate against thé defense, and while perhaps a contrary verdict would have been more acceptable to us, the one rendered finds such support in the evidence that it should not be disturbed. Judgment and order affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.