Levi Cotton Mills Co. v. Fried
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff in 1901 employed the defendant to bring a suit in the United States Circuit Court, and the defendant collected in that suit after an appeal, and in 1904 turned over the proceeds to the plaintiff, less the amount retained by him for his fees and disbursements. The defendant deducted 25 per cent., claiming a specific con
“That the plaintiff is entitled to recover against the defendant the sum of $43.41, the concession being made upon the express condition that it is without prejudice to the defendant's right to rely with fuil force and virtue upon the defense of accord and satisfaction, which has been pleaded, and the concession is accepted by the plaintiff upon that condition.”
The court found in favor of the defendant. I think the finding was justified, upon the proofs in the case, so far as the general controversy between the parties was concerned, but that the defense of accord and satisfaction was good only as to the $500 fee, and the plaintiff was entitled to recover the sum of $43.41, which the defendant conceded was due.
The judgment, therefore, should be modified, by directing judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant for $43.41, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. All concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.