Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907

Altieri v. Trotta

Altieri v. Trotta
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 10, 1907
103 N.Y.S. 715; 53 Misc. 649 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

John C. Oldmixon, for appellant., Frank A. Acer, for respondent.

Altieri v. Trotta

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The judgment was taken by default: The defendant appeals on the ground that he never was served with the summons and has never appeared in the action. This claim seems to be supported by a preponderance of proof. The defendant has adopted the proper practice in appealing directly to this court. Municipal Court Act, Laws 1902, p. 1578, c. 580, § 311; Austin v. Columbia Lubricants Co. (Sup.) 85 N. Y. Supp. 362; Diehl v. Steele, 49 Misc. Rep. 456, 97 N. Y. Supp. 1024.

The judgment must be held to be invalid, and reversed, and complaint dismissed, with costs to appellant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.