Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907

Regulus Cigar Co. v. Flannery

Regulus Cigar Co. v. Flannery
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 27, 1907
105 N.Y.S. 95 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Samuel F. Hyman, for appellant., Myers & Goldsmith, for respondent.

Regulus Cigar Co. v. Flannery

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

An examination of the record shows that the plaintiff failed in its proof, and for that reason alone the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint should have been granted. The learned trial justice, however, gave a judgment in favor of the defendant.

The judgment should be modified, by directing that the action be dismissed, with costs, without prejudice to a new action, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.