Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907

Wilke v. New York City Railway Co.

Wilke v. New York City Railway Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 29, 1907
107 N.Y.S. 8 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Henry F. Gannon, for appellant., Walter E. Bunnell, for respondent.

Wilke v. New York City Railway Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

It is conceded by counsel that the minutes in these cases have been transposed; that is, the minutes in No. 80 should form part of the record in No. 81, and vice versa. This court has no power to change the returns herein, and the cases cannot be properly decided with the returns in their present shape.

They must be returned to the files of the court, to await such action for their correction as counsel may decide.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.