Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907

Eidlin v. State Bank

Eidlin v. State Bank
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 29, 1907
107 N.Y.S. 53 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Abraham H. Sarssohn, for appellant., Feltenstein & Rosenstein, for respondent.

Eidlin v. State Bank

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The proof on the part of the plaintiff was not sufficient to entitle him to a judgment. A motion to dismiss the com*54plaint, made by the defendant’s counsel upon substantially that ground, was denied. The defendant thereupon rested, and the court gave a judgment for the defendant upon the merits. This was error. The defendant was entitled only to a judgment dismissing the complaint for failure of proof. Bowen v. Farley, 113 App. Div. 767, 99 N. Y. Supp. 205; Ætna Life Ins. Co. v. Deparquet Co., 53 Misc. Rep. 581, 103 N. Y. Supp. 800.

Judgment modified, by directing judgment for a dismissal of the complaint without prejudice to a new action, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.